JAMIE SIMMONDS
  • Jamie Simmonds
  • Rising from the Flood
  • Media
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Blog

Communicating with Residents During a Managed Retreat

24/2/2020

0 Comments

 

By claire-louise vermande

Following the deadly Queensland floods in 2011, where an “inland tsunami” formed to all but destroy the small town of Grantham, it was decided within a matter of weeks that the town would be relocated to higher ground to ensure the safety of its residents.  The managed retreat of any town is a complex operation, but the Strengthening Grantham Project not only proved to be successful but was completed in record time, with the first home ready only 11 months after the flood event. The success of the project can be attributed to many factors, from the short timeline to the Australian first land-swap initiative.  However, it was the involvement of the community that ensured the project had the greatest chance of succeeding. 

Regular community meetings were set up from the start of the project.  Different types of meetings were used to achieve different goals, including:
  • Initial community meetings were used to introduce the idea of the relocation to the residents
  • Master planning workshops were used to develop the layout of the new estate
  • One on one meetings between case workers and individual residents created tailored support to assist with financial and insurance matters
  • Open Days showcased the new estate
  • Ballot Days finalised which lot residents would get in the new estate
  • No new concepts were introduced & no questions taken at the Open Day or Ballot Day
Embed from Getty Images

"you can’t drill down into the detail, if you try to you’re going to get killed"

"We took every opportunity to explain our vision and what we were doing.  Other than the master planning workshops, where we had dedicated a lot of time to the community, we were touching base with residents regularly but just for five minutes here and there to say this was where we were at,” says Jamie Simmonds, former director of the Strengthening Grantham Project.

“That became really important because when you’re dealing with a disaster affected community sometimes speaking to everyone at once seems like a really good idea to spread the message but in reality it doesn’t work that way.  The only thing you can really do in a group setting is to introduce or confirm a concept, you can’t drill down into the detail and if you try to you’re going to get killed,” Jamie says.

Group Community Meetings Objectives:
  • Understanding what the community wanted to preserve in the town
  • Understanding what residents liked about the town, functionally and aesthetically
  • Ensuring the community remained engaged in the project
  • Ensuring residents understood they were having a safer town built for them
  • Introduction of the final master plan
Picture

"The only way you can drill down into the detail and talk about individual needs is on an indiviual level.  Most of the real value we had with the community was at that individual level."

The nature of the large community meetings meant that individuals weren't afforded an opportunity to speak.  To ensure that all residents were able to have their say, one on one meetings with case managers, led by Narelle Poole, were held often.  By not solely relying on the group meetings, case managers were also able to deliver information about the relocation on an individual level and these engagements often provided further valuable feedback.

Speaking to Individuals Achieved the Following:
  • Build relationships with residents, particularly those who were quiet and unwilling to ask for assistance in the first instance
  • Find out information that wouldn’t be offered in a group setting
  • Assist residents with sensitive information including banking and insurance details
  • Assisting residents who had family members pass away in the flood
  • Ensure residents understood contracts and the ballot process for the land-swap

"If we hadn’t been there to help them at an individual level they wouldn’t have been able to do the land-swap.  They probably would have either rebuilt in the flood plain or they would have walked away. That was a big part of the land-swap, it wasn’t just offering them an option, it was helping them take up the option.  That was where Narelle and the case managers really helped," says Jamie.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    ​​Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020

    RSS Feed

      sign up to receive future posts in your inbox.

    Subscribe to Newsletter
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Jamie Simmonds
  • Rising from the Flood
  • Media
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Blog